Caution!

Visiting this web site requires a newer version of Netscape Communicator.

Visit Microsoft's Web site to obtain the newest version of Internet Explorer, or visit Netscape's Web site to obtain the newest version of Netscape Communicator.

Visiting this web site without first upgrading your browser may result in unreliable behavior.













Ervin A. Gonzalez



Home


Ervin A. Gonzalez


Areas of Expertise


Mission Statement


Contact Us

CASES



Cases In The News


Significant Verdicts


Referrals

TRIAL TIPS



Trial Tips - Articles


Trial Tips Via E-Mail


Advanced Trial Handbook

LINKS



Consumer Links


Legal Links

CALENDAR



Seminars & Events

COMMENTARY



Chinese Drywall - Time to Take Action


Schiavo Matter Challenges Bush's Tort Reform Plan


Public School Segregation


Tort Reform


Judicial Independence


Safe Driving

NEWS ITEMS



News Releases


Video Clips


News Stories

MY BLOG



Trial Tips Blog


Sitemap




 

305-476-7400  

EAGonzalez@ErvinGonzalez.com  





Significant Verdicts


Click on the appropriate verdict link for further information regarding the case.

View the previous item
View the index page
View all items
View the next item



Legal Decision Prompts $2 Million Settlement for Boy Severly Injured by Chicken Kitchen Delivery Driver.

Jury Finds Chicken Kitchen’s National Franchisor Liable for Negligent Act of

Local Miami Franchisee

 

 

Miami, Florida February 1, 2007 - On April 9th, 2004 Plaintiff Joshua Szentpaly, 21 while driving his motorcyle, was hit by a Chicken Kitchen delivery car, owned and operated by Juan Carlos Lacroix.  Lacroix, an employee of the Chicken Kitchen Franchise located at 11425 SW 40th Street, Miami, failed to stop at a stop sign and hit Szentpaly, causing severe neurological damage and the loss of his right arm.

 

While the negligence of the driver was clear, a battle ensued over who was responsible – the National Franchisor (Chicken Kitchen USA, LLC) or the Local Franchisee. Chicken Kitchen USA, LLC claimed its franchisee was an independent contractor and therefore was not responsible for their acts and omissions.  After a three day jury trial in Novemeber 2006 before Judge Bob Scola, the Jury disagreed and found that Chicken Kitchen USA was legally responsible for the acts and omissions of its franchisee, because it controlled or had the right to control the day to day business activities of its franchisee pursuant to its franchise agreement and operating manual.  “Winning this issue was important,” said Ervin A. Gonzalez, Attorney for the Plaintiff.  “We needed to show that accountability and responsibility come with control, policy and making money.  The Franchisor wanted to dodge their responsibilities.  The jury decided that was wrong.”  The jury decision paved the way for another jury trial to decide the catastrophic injury case.

 

In January 2007, an appellate court denied the defendant’s writ of mandamous requesting the trial court to take the case off of the trial docket.  The decision prompted the defendant to tender the policy limits, resulting in a $2 Million settlement.

 

The case was tried in Miami-Dade County Circuit Court before a 6 person jury with one alternate.The Plaintiff’s case was handled by Ervin A. Gonzalez.  The Chicken Kitchen USA, LLC was represented by Frank Alloca and Bill Davis.














The hiring of an attorney is an important decision and should not be based on advertising alone.
Please feel free to contact me for further information on my qualifications.

This site was created by JBG Communications - Marketing and Public Relations





Sign In
Sign In